abstractmath.org
help with abstract math
Produced by Charles Wells. Home. Website Contents Website Index
Back to Sets beginning
Posted 5
December 2006
Let a and b be real numbers. We use
the notation for the set
. This is called the open interval from a to b. The closed interval
from a
to b is the set
The unit interval is defined to be the interval
.
The notation is also used to mean the ordered pair with
first coordinate a and second coordinate
b.
You can picture the set of real numbers as a line infinitely
long in both directions. Numbers a and b may be pictured as points on the line, this way:

The open interval
is the set of points between a and b, not including a and b.
The closed interval
is the set of points between a and b, including a and b.
The empty set
is the unique
set with no
elements at all. It is denoted by “{ }” or “ ”. The
existence and uniqueness of the empty set follows directly from the specification
for sets.
¨
,
because every square of a real number is nonegative.
¨
The interval
notation " [a, b]" defines the empty set if a > b. For example, . That is because by definition
,
but there are no real numbers that are bigger than 3 and less than 2.
¨
It is also true that .
¨ Because there is only one empty set, ,
[3, 2] and (3, 2) are all
exactly the same set. Another way of saying this is that “
”,
“[3, 2]” and “(3, 2)” are different representations of the same set, namely the empty set.
Since the empty set is a set,
it can be an element of another set. Consider this: although " " and " { }" both denote the
empty set,
is not
the empty set; it is a set whose only element is the empty set.
is in fact a singleton set.
If you think of a set as a container, the empty set is simply an empty container. The only problem with this is that there is only one empty set, whereas normally you expect that any number of different containers can be empty.
If you think of a set as a collection, there is a problem: If I didn’t own any chess pieces, I would not talk about “my collection of chess pieces”. If you don’t have something, you don’t have a collection of them!
The concept of collection also has the same problem that “container” has: You would mean two different things by the statements
¨ I don’t have a collection of chess pieces.
¨ I don’t have a collection of Hummel figures.
But there is only one empty set. It does not come in types!
If you think of a set as a pointer to its elements, then the empty set is the same as the null pointer. Again there is a problem: A computer program can have many different pointers set to null at the same time. But there is only one empty set.
As always, images and metaphors for the concept of set produce cognitive dissonance. Remember, the definition always wins!
A set containing exactly one element is called a singleton set.
¨ {3} is the set whose only element is 3.
¨
is the set whose only element is the empty set.
¨ The closed interval [3, 3] is the singleton set {3}, but the open interval (3, 3) is the empty set.
¨
but
is an infinite set.
¨
but
.
Because a set is distinct from its elements, a set with exactly one element is not the same thing as the element. Thus {3} is a set, not a number, whereas 3 is a number, not a set.